It seems to me that now no one can be surprised with pictures taken from above. Mostly drones are used for this, less often paragliders. But even with the recently formed massiveness of photographs from above, they still steal attention, surprise and cause a desire to repeat.
During last year's publication of photographs from a high altitude, I said that the flights that take place several times a year are enough for me.
I agree that in this case there are time and location restrictions.
A drone would give much more freedom in choosing a location to shoot, but its flight time is even more limited.
Plus, you can't fly on a drone yourself and you don't physically feel all those landscapes that can be felt from a helicopter.
Therefore, if the system gave me a flight, then I am grateful to it and should use it to the maximum.
But if the system hasn't let me down until now to buy a drone, then I don't need it.
It's enough for me that I manage to shoot in the time allotted for the flight.
It seems to me that if I manage to visit the altitude in the fall, it will be simply incredible pictures of beauty!
If I ever have a drone, I will start filming something graphically abstract.
Or now I'm just in such a mood.
But I'm glad I hooked up to the graphics frequency. This is difficult to do in the material cycle.
To be continued...