I wrote a post on this yesterday and along with many other stakeholders apart from the ones in the comments all are in agreement that this is nothing but excessive self-voting or vote-selling that goes against the EIP and curation in general and will not be accepted by Hive's stakeholders.
The initiators may tell you it's for your own good but behind the scenes, they're the ones mostly profiting from this and not the platform itself as it incentivizes to vote on anything as long they're getting the rewards.
From this post forward, accounts giving beneficiary to @ph-fund or any other account that suddenly may appear and attempt to do the same thing will face some downvotes to make this activity unprofitable for both the author and curator. What you're doing isn't genuine curation and not genuinely paying delegators fair returns.
Shame to the authors who are enabling this kind of activity and not speaking up about it within the community.
All post rewards going to @hbdstabilizer.