..so I also live in an altogether alive world.
Otherwise, the question arises as to how life gets into a mechanistic-causal, dead world machine, or how it is supposed to have gotten into it originally?
:)
Or has anyone ever observed how life emerges from the opposite (mechanistically causal dead processes)?
However, this is exactly what is being claimed by the dead-loving science:
- Either that life/ consciousness arose from the opposite.
- Or that it does not exist at all and is merely an illusion from the material (neurology).
It's funny how consciousness and life denies itself, creates theories to support this... but seems to forget that without its life/consciousness/mind it can't create ideas and theories, as these can only exist in consciousness.
After all, they are not something material. And even the Darwinian family tree did not fall from the sky or become an object!
They are apparently unaware that they deny themselves and therefore can pack it up. Or indulge in nihilism through exclamations like "the world is dead!", but at the same time live their lives in their free time and are also happy about small things.. ;)
I also recognise life by the fact that the human being has the special possibility of being inside and outside at the same time..
He is in the hand, but at the same time he sees it from the outside.
In the same way, he also appears to be simultaneously in nature, but somehow also outside it (can also create artificial things)..
And so you can also relate it to the cosmos/universe.
He is somehow inside and outside at the same time.
Personally, at any rate, I come to the conclusion that much less is dead than we think.
Rather, that everything is alive.
I'm not even close to being the first or the last realising this.
Nevertheless, it opens up a new and interesting perspective for most people.
I'm curious to see what happens next. :)
/woelfchen
Look above!
Picture source: In Memoriam: Mr. Ducke
