Quick follow-up and update to "Where did the flu go?"

Earlier in the week I wrote the post How about that FLU vaccine? Did they mysteriously cure the flu...? Little did I know that more information would be coming out about this from the CDC themselves. In fact, a lot of information has been coming out to support what has been being called "misinformation" as actually being the truth. This is another example of why policing "misinformation" is dangerous. Who is the gate keeper? Who is the lord and master of what is true or not true? If you have a name for such a person. Why do you blindly trust them?


Link to CDC document.

First. If you haven't already heard the CDC is coming out confirming the RT-PCR test is unreliable and should not be used for this type of testing. This is something those of us accused of spreading "misinformation" have been stating for awhile because we actually bothered to pay attention to the guy that invented the RT-PCR test and won a Nobel Prize for it when he stated it should not be used for this type of testing. He stated why. Essentially he stated with enough cycles you can find virtually ANYTHING on ANYONE. This easily explains the many false positives. It also explains why authorities in some countries performed tests on all kinds of things that came back as positive for COVID such as Papaya.

(Image Source: healthyfoodhouse.com)

This method could easily make it seem like there was a surge at anytime just by increasing the number of cycles in the test a bit. It could also artificially make vaccines seem more effective by making them use less cycles when testing vaccinated people. This is something the CDC actually requested awhile back and I did a post on it linking to their own PDF and documentation.

Yet the question still often comes to mind "What happened to the flu?". You are aware that the flu can be nasty and people die from it every year in hospitals? At least in a normal year.

Lately flu seems to have mostly disappeared.

This is why I wrote the article on it the other day. Well this particular CDC document that I linked to above from the CDC contains what might be the proverbial smoking gun.


Note the following section which I will quote:

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing.

Let me further zero down on that now that I've quoted the entire section. I didn't want to be accused of taking it out of context.

CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.

Do you see that?

Adoption of a method that can differentiate between COVID and FLU.

That seems to imply that the RT-PCR cannot do that. That also seems to imply that it is highly likely many reported COVID cases are actually FLU.

If this is true then the vaccines (assuming they work) wouldn't do anything against the Flu. It also means that the COVID numbers would be heavily inflated because they would be both COVID and FLU. This also explains why FLU cases seem to have virtually disappeared.

In addition, the horrible deaths in hospitals. Such horrible deaths DO happen every year in hospitals from flu.

Because they are horrible does not mean they are COVID.

It also means how deadly COVID is likely is also inflated...

Hospitals are paid more if they provide a COVID diagnosis. They are provided even more if they can attribute a death to COVID. For a death to be attributed they only need a positive test (see false positives above and Papaya). The actual cause of death does not have to be COVID for them to add it to the COVID death statistics.

Even with these factors the morbidity rate of COVID is LOW. It is around the same and maybe slightly worse than a normal flu season. Yet if the flu is getting lumped in with it then it is potentially less deadly than the flu.

A NORMAL flu season. Not a bad flu season.

Yet we locked down, demanded masks, destroyed economies, increased suicide rates, increased divorce rates, and violated the Constitution and laws in a mad authoritarian power grab that the people went along with because the propaganda is constantly telling them BE AFRAID. BE OH SO AFRAID. ANYONE THAT ISN'T AFRAID ATTACK THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE WHY YOU ARE AFRAID.

Propaganda 101: Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.

Be careful when you accuse someone of pedaling "misinformation" because it very well could be YOU that is guilty of such acts.

If we believe in freedom of speech then you should be able to. Other people will simply hopefully counter it with better information as opposed to trying to silence you.

EDIT: Update

I don't know if this is related. Apparently this occurred right after Bill Gates and George Soros acquired a new COVID-19 testing company. The "theory" is that this move may be a push to make the U.S. switch to using the Gates/Soros product.

Only time will tell on this one...


Link to National File article





3 columns
2 columns
1 column