There is a certain concept for me as a colorful urban landscape. It may contain dirt, shabby, piled-up objects. In theory, this is the most repulsive in appearance. But I find something atmospheric in him, as in many other similar pictures taken by other photographers.
And since other photographers also shoot like that, it means that something excites them in such views.
I would like to ask myself: what is this or that photo about? What is the meaning of it?
Or maybe you don't need to look everywhere for meaning...
Or looking at the pictures, everyone will find their own meaning for themselves.
Even if the photo does not evoke any emotions, or evokes negative emotions, then this already has a certain meaning.
Perhaps such sensations will make someone get up off the couch and go to do better than me.
There is just a huge variety of options for the development of events.
Until you choose one, they are all correct.
For the first time in Cherepovets, I saw brick barracks.
They look the same as wooden ones, but are made of silicate bricks.
I always ask those who support and approve only high-quality beautiful pictures: what about ugly places?
Why can't a photographer capture dirt, panel houses, something dilapidated?
You will say that you already see it every day and are tired of such views.
Let's say, but if it is watched by a resident of another country where there is no such thing, or vice versa, where is it even worse?
For us this is common, but for a foreigner it is the same as if we were looking at the slums of Argentina or the tribes of the Congo.
You need to think about the meaning of your shots from all possible angles.
Imagine yourself as a native or, on the contrary, as a resident of a highly developed country.
For some reason I'm trying to prove something to someone...although I don't need it.
I just watch the world of photography and just the world.
And Cherepovets, of course, is good in all plans!